Guardians
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trey Mancini | 27 | Majors | OF | Medium | 3.5 | 41.7 | 17 | 24.7 | 24.7 | 28.9 | 33 |
Total Value:
28.9
Orioles
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Freeman | Minors | 2B | 17.3 | 13.8 | 17.3 | 20.8 | ||||||
| Ethan Hankins | Minors | RHP | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 5.8 | ||||||
| Richie Palacios | Minors | 2B | 2.3 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.8 | ||||||
| Lenny Torres | Minors | RHP | 4 | 3.2 | 4 | 4.8 |
Total Value:
28.4
I agree that Baltimore most likely sees Mancini as a centerpiece for their rebuild, however, if they are presented with this package or something similar, I think it would be tough to turn down. Coming off a season where Mancini was viewed as a replacement level hitter, selling high on a controllable asset would be something for Baltimore to consider. Indians definitely have a need for a middle-of-the-lineup hitter, given the lack of production from Kipnis and more disappointingly, Jose Ramirez. Mancini adds stability to the lineup, keeping them in the hunt this year and for the remaining 3 years of club control.