| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabriel Arias | 23 | Majors | SS | 6 | 17.1 | 7.9 | 9.2 | 7.4 | 9.2 | 11 | ||
| Will Brennan | 25 | Majors | OF | 6 | 20.1 | 7.4 | 12.6 | 10.1 | 12.6 | 15.1 |
Total Value:
21.80
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Ward | 30 | Majors | OF | Medium | 3 | 44.6 | 21.4 | 23.2 | 18.6 | 23.2 | 27.9 |
Total Value:
23.2
Cleveland targets type of player (RH OF) that they need and don't have. Angels begin re-rostering with plan to turn 1 player into 2 players, minimum.
I would certainly consider this, but I'm a big Arias fan and don't think they should sell him while his value is low. Expect his value to increase dramatically by this time next year. Anyway, would the Angels prefer a Rocchio for Ward deal? I would even include Brennan in the deal as well if needed.
BigBat. That's a conundrum. by next season all values will change...up, down because the number of control years change performance influences. Time waits for no one. Of course Angels would take Brennan and Rocchio but the BTV system might reject if values are too far apart. I will propose that deal. (and refer complaints)