Athletics & Orioles

Submitted by: grover

January 9, 2024

Athletics

Name	Age	Level	P1	P2	Availability	Years	AFV	Salary	Surplus	Low	Median	High
Hudson Haskin	24	Minors	OF			0	0	0	1.7	1.4	1.7	2.1
Round A Comp Balance Pick	0	Minors			0	0	0	0	4	3.2	4	4.8

Total Value:

5.7

Orioles

Name	Age	Level	P1	P2	Availability	Years	AFV	Salary	Surplus	Low	Median	High
Paul Blackburn	30	Majors	LRP	SP	Medium	2	15.6	8	7.6	6.1	7.6	9.1

Total Value:

7.6

You found a premium feature!

Want an ad-free experience, with access to our premium features, like the Team Rankings, GM Override, Player Rankings, and Future Trade/Free Agent/Extension Values Graphs?

Comments

grover

January 10, 2024 at 12:03 AM

Forst Dummy Tax in affect at a max value of 5.7 BTV... Now, the A's have said they have no intention of trading Blackburn ahead of ST but I believe the Comp A pick could change their mind. The Orioles were willing to leave Haskin exposed during the Rule 5 draft so there's at least some acceptance to the idea of him not being part of the organization. Would Baltimore trade a draft pick to add a non-TOR arm to the rotation?

Ms. Dajuba

January 10, 2024 at 12:13 AM

I think Baltimore keeps the pick but I’d do it, you need pitching depth if you’re going to compete for a title.

Xfactor

January 11, 2024 at 2:17 AM

Gotta think Baltimore wants better than Blackburn depth is important but that is NOT a sexy move

grover

January 11, 2024 at 3:22 AM

I agree, trading for Blackburn would not be sexy. But the more sexy options will also be more expensive, either in FA dollars or prospect capital, and the Orioles have been hesitant to shop at those higher prices.