Guardians & Mariners
Submitted by: WrongVerb
Guardians
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gabriel Gonzalez | 19 | Minors | OF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 8.8 | 11 | 13.2 | ||
Walter Ford | 19 | Minors | SP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.6 | 2 | 2.4 |
Total Value:
13
Mariners
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Josh Naylor | 27 | Majors | 1B | OF | Low | 2 | 31.1 | 18 | 13.1 | 10.5 | 13.1 | 15.7 |
Total Value:
13.1
Comments
4Teams have asked about Josh Naylor, but I don't see Cleveland trading him especially for two 19 year olds. Cleveland is not rebuilding. This makes no sense for the Guardians.
I do like this trade but I don't see Mariners doing it now after Raley trade and Garver signing
Naylor isn't available... Writers just did it for clicks/teams inquired... He's not being moved
I'd like to understand the logic used to justify the idea of Cleveland trading one of their best hitters for 2 19 yr old prospects. The idea is ridiculously simpleminded.