| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lyon Richardson | 23 | Majors | SP | 6 | 38.4 | 25.7 | 12.7 | 10.1 | 12.7 | 15.2 | ||
| Leonardo Balcazar | 0 | Minors | SS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 6.5 | 7.9 | ||
| Logan Tanner | 22 | Minors | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 |
Total Value:
21.7
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edgar Quero | 20 | Minors | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.3 | 15.5 | 19.3 | 23.1 |
Total Value:
19.3
Agree that the Reds could use India to acquire an MLB or near MLB catcher. I love Quero but not sure I would give up Balcazar.
Why Quero? Why not a better defensive catcher with just as much or better offensive projection with the same value: Kyle Teel?
Kyle Teel or Cal Raleigh would be great for the Reds. Like Kirk with Toronto as well.
4 position players (switch-hitters) is as Bell-proof a lineup as is humanly possible.
Quero is not a good defensive catcher. A position that demands defense. Your argument about being a 4th switch hitter is has no merit.
Slow winter day. A year from now when Edwin Arroyo is poised to take over as everyday switch-hitting ss, along side switch-hitters EDLC and Jeimer Candelario- it would be nice to promote Edgar Quero as switch hitting catcher and make it a quartet (even if it cost Balcazar).