Phillies & Athletics
Submitted by: stulldog069
Phillies
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brent Rooker | 29 | Majors | DH | Low | 4.6 | 85.7 | 49.3 | 36.4 | 29.1 | 36.4 | 43.6 | |
Seth Brown | 32 | Majors | OF | 1B | Medium | 1.6 | 0 | 1.8 | -1.8 | -2.1 | -1.8 | -1.4 |
Mason Miller | 25 | Majors | RP | 4.6 | 72.7 | 41.4 | 31.2 | 25 | 31.2 | 37.5 |
Total Value:
65.8
Athletics
Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brandon Marsh | 27 | Majors | OF | Low | 2.6 | 25.6 | 13.9 | 11.7 | 9.3 | 11.7 | 14 | |
Jordan Romano | 32 | Majors | RP | Medium | 0.6 | 2.7 | 5.5 | -2.8 | -3.3 | -2.8 | -2.2 | |
Griff McGarry | 25 | Minors | SP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 | ||
Aroon Escobar | 19 | Minors | 2B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.8 | 4.6 | 5.8 | 7 | ||
Aidan Miller | 20 | Minors | SS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.6 | 28.5 | 35.6 | 42.8 | ||
Griffin Burkholder | 19 | Minors | CF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | 5.9 | 7.3 | 8.8 |
Total Value:
58.50
Comments
1Would the Phillies intend to play Rooker in LF? Because Schwarber at DH has been working real nice... Down vote for the A's. Seth Brown as a salary dump isn't that much in savings. Trading Rooker so soon after giving him an extension would look bad; then again, 1-20 looks worse. Marsh isn't necessary and acquiring him for two players with a lot more control doesn't make much sense. (Even for Forst.) Why trade for a short term asset when you're gutting your chances for short term success? I don't get the appeal of Aroon Escobar. I know he's a Top 100 guy for BA but I don't get why. In this scenario, Abel (10.1) and Crawford (14.7) make more sense than the non-A. Miller pieces being offered.