Diamondbacks & Yankees
Submitted by: Brian cashman masterclass
Diamondbacks
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everson Pereira | 23 | Majors | OF | 4.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Clayton Beeter | 25 | Majors | LRP | 4.4 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | ||
| Francisco Vilorio | 17 | Minors | OF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 | ||
| Cam Schlittler | 23 | Majors | SP | 5.4 | 11.7 | 0 | 11.7 | 9.4 | 11.7 | 14.1 | ||
| Eric Reyzelman | 23 | Minors | RP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.2 |
Total Value:
14.80
Yankees
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Beeks | 32 | Majors | RP | Low | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1 | |
| Merrill Kelly | 36 | Majors | SP | Medium | 0.4 | 7.1 | 2.8 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 5.2 | |
| Eugenio Suarez | 33 | Majors | 3B | Low | 0.4 | 11.5 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 6.7 |
Total Value:
10.8
Comments
6
Pereira having literally zero trade value here kinda confuses me. You'd think it'd be at least five, considering his Fangraphs projections are at the level of a solid backup outfielder.
NEWSLETTER? SURE, SIGN ME UP!
The trade values on here are bogus. It's only analytics and contract length. I've been saying it for a while now - the site shouldn't have the option to reject a trade or not. This site does not take into account for the value in a buyer/sellers market. MY biggest point has been Suarez with the Dbacks. I would say he is by far the most sought after player in the market right now and as of yesterday his value was 5 but Alek Thomas was 9 yesterday. There is no way in God's green Earth a team would send a better package for Thomas than Suarez. The value on these players need to account for more than just stats and contracts. Also, Perdomo is valued higher than Corbin Carroll..
Please do some homework. First off, we have been tracking all trades since 2019, and in that timespan our model has been right 94% of the time, with an average variance of 2.1. More details: https://www.baseballtradevalues.com/history This is why the industry uses our site as a benchmark. Secondly, GM-tier users have the right to override any restrictions, so you are welcome to disagree all you like if you're a subscriber on that tier.
"First off", I'm assuming you work for this site based on the response you gave but it wasn't noted so I will just assume. I would think that a response to someone who is paying for a membership to this site might get a more respectful response as well. Secondly, I was unaware of the tier modes that have different subscriptions, I should have done my homework on that. Thirdly, I can disagree with you all I want. I don't have to pay a certain amount to disagree with someone or a specific entity. I may very well be wrong, but I stand by my statement that this site highly factors analytics and contract length more than anything else. You have to account for buyers/sellers market as well as comradery and history of a specific player. If Suarez gets traded and the return is of equal value or less than that of a 5-7 points which is what he has been valued at the last week or two I will retract my statement and apologize. Though, if he is traded and the Diamondbacks get value of 9+ I will stand by my statement.
Fair enough. And sorry -- didn't mean to sound disrepectful.
His projections on Fangraphs are zeros across the board. He's on his last option year, after which he would have to stick on an active roster, or be DFA'd (this alone is a value killer). Finally, we've learned over time that front office actions speak loudly -- if they thought he would be productive at the MLB level, they would have called him up by now (he hasn't been called up since 2023).