Yankees & Rangers
Submitted by: mmalkoskie
Yankees
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob deGrom | 37 | Majors | SP | Low | 2.3 | 52.5 | 88.3 | -35.9 | -43 | -35.9 | -28.7 | |
| Corey Seager | 31 | Majors | SS | 3B | Low | 6.3 | 232.1 | 200.3 | 31.8 | 25.4 | 31.8 | 38.2 |
Total Value:
-4.10
Rangers
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Stroman | 34 | Majors | SP | Low | 0.3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | -4.8 | -4 | -3.2 |
Total Value:
-4
Comments
4
This is a great example of the edge cases that render this model fairly useless
Ah yes the “let me have your best players and I’ll give you my worst player”
It's more like: take on $288M in salary obligations for two older, oft-injured players well into their decline years, and give up nothing of consequence, since taking on the money is the big commitment.
NEWSLETTER? SURE, SIGN ME UP!
It it were useless, we wouldn't be doing this. You need to consider in the money and injury risk in this example.