Cubs & Rays

Submitted by: Frank89

Cubs

NameAgeLevelP1P2AvailabilityYearsAFVSalarySurplusLowMedianHigh
Junior Caminero22Majors3B5154.163.790.472.390.4108.4

Total Value:

90.4

Rays

NameAgeLevelP1P2AvailabilityYearsAFVSalarySurplusLowMedianHigh
Justin Steele29MajorsSPMedium249.724.625.220.125.230.2
Owen Caissie23MajorsOF616.80.316.513.216.519.8
Jefferson Rojas20MinorsSS00020.516.420.524.6
Matt Shaw23Majors3BSS557.62334.627.734.641.5

Total Value:

96.8

You found a premium feature!

Want an ad-free experience, with access to our premium features, like the Team Rankings, GM Override, Player Rankings, and Future Trade/Free Agent/Extension Values Graphs?

General Manager Badge
mp2891

There is a non zero chance the Rays trade JC, but there is zero chance it’s for a return like this. A quarter of the trade value is in a pitcher coming back from TJS and who only has 2 years of control. Rays will have no interest in Steele. The headliner is a defense first, below average bat. Rays love those types and they have a bunch in-house already. They aren’t going to pay $35 MM in trade value to add Shaw and his 1-2 fWAR. Caissie has a K problem that gives him a low ceiling and Rojas is fine I guess but I think he’s overrated offensively. JC might put up 6+ fWAR next year. Is there any chance the 4 Cubs players do that in the aggregate (in any year)? I’d bet on JC every year. Rays say no to this trade and it’s not particularly close.

CCMosley

I'm a big Shaw fan but I don't understand how his value is still so high, I think he could still turn out to be a very good regular but I wouldn't want to trade for him at that value

General Manager Badge
johnbitzer

5 years of cheap control for a player who probably has more upside than he's shown, as development is non-linear and players tend to peak in their mid-to-late '20s.

CCMosley

I just looked it up I could have sworn Shaw came up in 2024 and didn't do very well and went back to AAA but I guess that was all this year, i was thinking he'd had back to back not so good mlb seasons so he still has pretty good value but 35 still a pretty steep price, that means he's equivalent to 3,500 Brandon Lowes for him lol

General Manager Badge
mp2891

I was probably too hard on Shaw in my initial write up. His bat is probably better than he showed this year, which was hurt by a below league average BABIP and (I suspect) a more tentative rookie swing that affected his ISO. On the other hand, his defense is probably below what I thought it was. I hate seeing defensive stats wildly disagree on players defensive value, which they did in Shaw’s case, telling me his defense may not be as good as I originally thought. Add it all up and I still don’t like him as a headliner for JC but he’s probably better than a 1-2 fWAR player.

NEWSLETTER? SURE, SIGN ME UP!