GM Override: ok.
Have a reason to override our rules? Become a paid subscriber.
Cardinals
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Fitts | 26 | Majors | SP | LRP | 5 | 13.8 | 6.3 | 7.5 | 6 | 7.5 | 8.9 | |
| Brandon Clarke | 23 | Minors | SP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16.2 | 13 | 16.2 | 19.5 |
Total Value:
23.7
Red Sox
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonny Gray | 36 | Majors | SP | Medium | 1 | 30.6 | 40 | -9.4 | -11.3 | -9.4 | -7.5 | |
| Cash | 20 |
Total Value:
10.6
I don’t know anything about Clarke of the Red Sox system. Why is he valued so highly? MLB and Fangraphs have him at a 50 grade overall. In comparison, the Angels have Ryan Johnson who was drafted ahead of Clarke, has better results than him at the same level, has an overall grade of 55 by MLB, yet has a BTV of 5.1 versus Clarke’s 16.2.
Personally, I think the values are always a work in progress, ⬆️ ⬇️, is probably how both are trending. And Clarke may still be holding some SP value, but he’s probably a LH RP. Just my guess.
Clarke was rated higher by Baseball America, but his value will likely go down in our next update, as more prospect evaluators update their ratings. We're at the mercy of their schedules, unfortunately.
Why would they need Brandon Clarke who had control issues last year while also having Tolle/Early just starting their clocks? Clarke was a clear example of a sell high candidate and has very high reliever risk. This was a solid move for both sides. Red Sox get a sure thing near the top of the rotation while the Cardinals clear some payroll while getting back some upside both at the MLB and MiLB level.
Where oh where I did write that the Red Sox needed Clarke? I gave my thought that I was surprised they were willing to include him and that they must be down on him. Then I gave my thought to a question in a post that explained why Clarkes value might be where it is.
You said "I can't believe they were willing to include Clarke" with a facepalm emoji. This implies that they needed him or at the very least shouldn't have traded him. Why would not they not include Clarke to get a good SP?
Ahhh…so you agree, I didn’t write that the Red Sox needed Clarke. It’s just you reading between the lines and twisting it to fit your narrative. You’re exhausting.