Angels
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taitn Gray | 18 | Minors | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.2 | 19.4 | 24.2 | 29.1 | ||
| Daniel Pierce | 20 | Minors | SS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.2 | 19.4 | 24.2 | 29.1 |
Total Value:
48.4
Rays
| Name | Age | Level | P1 | P2 | Availability | Years | AFV | Salary | Surplus | Low | Median | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach Neto | 25 | Majors | SS | 2B | 3.3 | 86.7 | 32.9 | 53.9 | 43.1 | 53.9 | 64.6 |
Total Value:
53.9
What does "done for the season" matter to a guy in A ball?
Everything to the acquiring team and you know it.
I don't expect Pierce to be traded until he plays next year and shows he's healthy, but there's nothing to stop teams from trading for him if they're comfortable with the medicals. It's not like anyone is acquiring Pierce for the stretch run for this year's playoffs. One thing I know for sure is that if Pierce isn't moved at this year's Deadline, he won't be available in trade until next year's Deadline (and maybe not then) because the Rays almost never trade top prospects while they're in the low minors (Libby for Aroz being the only exception I can think of).