Angels & Guardians & Athletics

Trades

Players

Back

Angels & Guardians & Athletics

September 20, 2022

Angels

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Rosario 26 Majors SS OF Medium 1 12.7 7.4 5.3 4.2 5.3 6.3

Guardians

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Murphy 27 Majors C Low 3 94 40 54 43.2 54 64.8

Athletics

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Arias Minors SS 7.8 6.2 7.8 9.4
Bush Minors LHP 5.1 4.1 5.1 6.1
Quantrill 27 Majors SP Medium 3 20.8 10.4 10.3 8.3 10.3 12.4
Williams Minors RHP 28.4 22.7 28.4 34.1
13 Comments
  1. J.M. F.

    Cleveland said no to any Murphy trade at the deadline that had Williams in it. I doubt that they add Quantrill to Williams now. Cleveland says no.

  2. Nathan Thompson

    Down vote for Oakland.

    Quantrill is a “No” for the A’s, who have emphasized team control in every trade they’ve made during the teardown.

    • Ty Archy

      So it would have to pretty much be Bibee instead of Quantrill in a sense for Oakland to take the deal? Cleveland says no, but If Cleveland was okay with moving Williams…

      • Nathan Thompson

        I wasn’t thinking Bibee in place of Quantrill; with Williams and Bush in the mix I’d rather the A’s added a bat instead.

        But I don’t expect Cleveland to change their stance on Williams.

  3. Big Bat

    Moving Williams for Murphy with Naylor and Lavastida already in the system is silliness. These 2 teams discussed Murphy already and the asking price was too high and now folks think Cleveland will give even more? Somebody say something that makes sense please.

    • Nathan Thompson

      Words that make sense… as Sean Murphy wraps up a 5 Win season the idea that Oakland’s asking price was too high has been proven false.

      • Big Bat

        Yes sir, and he’ll be in Oakland until they lower the price which was proven at the last deadline.

        • Nathan Thompson

          Cleveland wanted Murphy on the cheap which is not the same as Oakland setting their price too high.

          • J.M. F.

            Oakland set the price too high for Cleveland and other teams to swing a trade. That is what happened since no trade happened.

          • Ty Archy

            Oakland had their price too high since no one actually traded for him, but at the same time, Oakland doesn’t have to trade him for any less either. It wouldn’t surprise me to see Murphy moved at the winter meetings since the free agency Cs aren’t really that great as a group in general…

          • Big Bat

            Since nobody else dealt for him either I’d say the price was too high. Good grief!

Submit a Comment