Submitted by: previn.naidu
| Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
| Blackburn |
25 |
Majors |
SP |
|
Medium |
4.7 |
7.6 |
5 |
2.6 |
0.6 |
2.6 |
4.6 |
| Eierman |
|
Minors |
2B |
3B |
|
|
|
|
4 |
3.2 |
4 |
4.8 |
| Estrada |
35 |
Majors |
SP |
|
Medium |
0.7 |
-1.2 |
2.7 |
-3.9 |
-5.9 |
-5 |
-4 |
| Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
| Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
| Diekman |
32 |
Majors |
LHRP |
|
Very high |
1.5 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
2.6 |
3.6 |
Interesting approach. At first glance, this one looks a bit unrealistic when you see the Royals taking Estrada. But I get that his inclusion is merely a way to balance out the numbers and justify the Royals getting both Eierman and Blackburn. It could work. I do like Diekman as a target for the A’s.
Points for creativity!
I would rather DFA Estrada, than give up a valuable trade piece to get rid of him. I know cash is king with the A’s, but seems like a waste of talent to me.