Submitted by: JeffDLutz13
Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
McKenzie |
|
Minors |
RHP |
|
|
|
|
|
22.7 |
18.2 |
22.7 |
27.2 |
Naquin |
28 |
Majors |
OF |
|
Medium |
3.5 |
17.3 |
7.7 |
9.6 |
7.7 |
9.6 |
11.5 |
Zimmer |
26 |
Majors |
OF |
|
Medium |
4.5 |
24.7 |
8.2 |
16.5 |
13.2 |
16.5 |
19.8 |
Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
Haniger |
28 |
Majors |
OF |
|
Medium |
3.5 |
61.6 |
24.7 |
36.9 |
30.7 |
36.9 |
43.1 |
Leake |
31 |
Majors |
SP |
|
High |
1.5 |
24.2 |
21.5 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
3.7 |
4.7 |
Santana |
26 |
Majors |
OF |
|
Medium |
2.5 |
15.6 |
8.8 |
6.8 |
4.8 |
6.5 |
8.3 |
Completely fascinating trade here, the Mariners would love to add another top 100 prospect (especially a pitcher), it will fully depend on how they see Haniger moving forward. Cleveland would love to have both Haniger and Santana in their outfield, as it’s a pretty steep upgrade from what they’re running out there right now.
McKenzie likely seen as damaged goods, right now, however. I’m not sure why the Mariners would want Naquin. With that said, I really hope the Indians do pursue Haniger and/or Santana leading up to the deadline.