Submitted by: BrewersSooner
Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
Means |
28 |
Majors |
SP |
|
Medium |
2 |
13.7 |
7.4 |
6.3 |
5 |
6.3 |
7.6 |
Santander |
27 |
Majors |
OF |
|
Medium |
2 |
27.1 |
18.5 |
8.6 |
6.9 |
8.6 |
10.5 |
Tate |
28 |
Majors |
RHRP |
|
Medium |
3 |
13.8 |
7.5 |
6.3 |
5.1 |
6.3 |
7.6 |
Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
Alexander |
30 |
Majors |
SP |
RHRP |
Medium |
6 |
4.7 |
1.9 |
2.8 |
2.3 |
2.8 |
3.4 |
Houser |
29 |
Majors |
SP |
RHRP |
Medium |
2 |
15.1 |
9 |
6.1 |
4.9 |
6.1 |
7.4 |
Taylor |
28 |
Majors |
OF |
|
High |
4 |
19.5 |
6.8 |
12.7 |
10.2 |
12.7 |
15.2 |
I don’t know how the Brewers could turn this down. I know Means is coming off TJ surgery and is probably out for a bit or at the very least restricted somewhat, but still a decent deal for Milwaukee.
I’m interested to read comments from the Orioles point of view. I think they would rather have Lauer. He’s a left-handed pitcher and a better replacement for Means. The signing of Miley might make it possible for the Brewers to include Lauer instead of Alexander. Brewers would have Burnes, Woodruff, Peralta, Miley, Ashby, and Means when he’s ready. If I’m the Brewers, I still go with that trade because having Santander in the lineup and Tate in setup would be worth it in my opinion. So, the trade would be:
Orioles get: Lauer, Houser and Taylor.
Brewers get: Means, Santander, and Tate.
Yes, the value increases for the Orioles but I think it’s a trade the Orioles are more likely to approve, and it still helps both teams.