Submitted by: TheBryceisRight3
| Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
| Rosario |
27 |
Majors |
SS |
OF |
Medium |
0.8 |
11.8 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
4.7 |
5.9 |
7.1 |
| Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
| Bruns |
|
Minors |
LHP |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
2.7 |
3.4 |
4.1 |
| Thompson |
32 |
Majors |
OF |
|
Medium |
2.7 |
1.5 |
1 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
| Wrobleski |
|
Minors |
LHP |
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
2 |
A bunch of Cleveland fans would move him for a moldy PB&J sandwich…
Two criteria though, one, they would have to get a player with a skill set they like and 1 or less has to be rule 5 eligible/have to be added to the 40 man roster in 23/24…
This doesn’t fit the criteria I listed above… Bruns is someone Cleveland would never trade for and if they would ever acquire him, it would be as a minor league free agent. He cannot throw strikes and that goes against e
What Cleveland signs/acquires…
The deal would have to start with Knack over Bruns…
Now when it comes to Thompson… Why would Cleveland want back a guy they let go?
So if you want to get Rosario, it would be Knack plus Galiz… Would that be acceptable?
Dodgers don’t want Rosario.