Submitted by: silentbob2001
Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
Blackburn |
29 |
Majors |
SP |
|
Medium |
2.1 |
20.8 |
7.8 |
13 |
10.4 |
13 |
15.6 |
Jimenez |
29 |
Majors |
RP |
|
Medium |
4.1 |
11.3 |
6.4 |
4.9 |
3.9 |
4.9 |
5.8 |
Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
Jung |
22 |
Minors |
2B |
|
|
|
|
|
16.7 |
13.4 |
16.7 |
20.1 |
Manning |
25 |
Majors |
SP |
|
Low |
4.1 |
4.8 |
3.1 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
1.6 |
2 |
Down vote for Oakland.
I’m a fan of Manning and I think this deal would have a lot of potential if Jung had a chance to play 2B for the A’s… which he doesn’t. Gelof will be manning 2B for the A’s in the near and mid-term and that would push Jung into LF (which he’s never played) or DH. I don’t believe the A’s would trade two pitchers to acquire a LH bat with such limited defensive ability.