Submitted by: kellyleak76
| Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
| Cobb |
32 |
Majors |
SP |
|
Very high |
1.3 |
6.2 |
20.0 |
-13.8 |
-20 |
-13.8 |
-11.8 |
| Nunez |
26 |
Majors |
DH |
3B |
High |
4.3 |
7.5 |
4.8 |
2.7 |
2.1 |
2.7 |
3.3 |
| Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
| Davis |
32 |
Majors |
DH |
OF |
Low |
1.3 |
2.2 |
22.7 |
-20.5 |
-22.5 |
-20.5 |
-18.5 |
| Neuse |
25 |
Majors |
3B |
2B |
High |
5.3 |
12.3 |
5.4 |
6.9 |
5.2 |
6.9 |
8.6 |
| Smith |
|
Minors |
OF |
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
3.4 |
Are you trying to give Baltimore the monopoly on overpaid Chris/Khris Davises?
The idea of pairing Cobb with another productive veteran makes sense from Baltimore’s perspective, but they would not want to take on another underwater contract. They’d be better off adding, say, $12M to cover the difference and then some, and getting a minor prospect back.