Braves & Mariners

Trades

Players

Back

Braves & Mariners

October 23, 2020

Braves

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Margevicius 24 Majors SP Medium 5.0 11.4 7.6 3.8 3 3.8 4.6
Seager 32 Majors 3B High 2.0 26.9 33.0 -6.1 -6.7 -5.5 -4.3
Cash 5

Mariners

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Inciarte 29 Majors OF High 2.0 -2.3 9.7 -12 -9.7 -9.7 -9.7
Vodnik Minors RHP 2.9 2.3 2.9 3.5
Wilson 22 Majors SP RHRP Medium 5.0 19.2 11.4 7.8 6.3 7.8 9.4
3 Comments
  1. Keith Henry

    Don’t think the M’s would create a hole at 3rd just to pick up a couple of so=so pitchers and a washed-up outfielder.

    • Jason Ryan

      I don’t think they do that either? I think Bryse Wilson is potentially really undervalued and would instantly slot into the M’s rotation and is the main get for the M’s here as their rotation could use some depth. I don’t think moving Seager creates as much of hole at 3B as you’d think with Ty France able to be plugged in there and he probably deserves a regular look at this point. Moore and Long can also fill in at 3B as needed. Inciarte is a salary dump from ATL which the M’s can afford to take on financially and is probably the main reason this trade theoretically could even happen as I think you’re undervaluing Bryse Wilson a bit. Vodnik is a throw in admittedly but could be a decent option for Seattle’s bullpen pile.

      • John Bitzer

        It’s possible that Wilson is undervalued. But before his breakout start in the playoffs, he had been passed over numerous times even when the Braves were desperate for starters, and his stats did not suggest he was undervalued either. His relief risk was also high given his repertoire. We’ll continue to monitor it. Thanks for the feedback.

Submit a Comment