Athletics & Marlins

Trades

Players

Back

Athletics & Marlins

May 12, 2021

Athletics

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Cimber 30 Majors RHRP Medium 3.0 3.2 2.4 0.8 0.5 0.8 1.1
Rojas 32 Majors SS Medium 2.0 17.8 9.7 8.1 6.3 8.1 9.9

Marlins

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Buelvas Minors OF 4.6 3.7 4.6 5.5
Deichmann Minors 1B OF 4.2 3.4 4.2 5
4 Comments
  1. Jordan Liff

    A’s need to desperately address SS and relegate Andrus to the bench vet role. Not only does Rojas represent a clear defensive upgrade, his positional flexibility allows for Oakland to shift Jed to DH on rest days with Rojas manning a competent 2b (as well as occasionally rest Olson with the same). Oakland’s bullpen is also stuttering and although league-average, Cimber provides a much needed upgrade over Guerra, Guidan, and Weems.

    Miami gets a near-term solution to 1B and RF in Deichman and a low-level, high ceiling lotto ticket in Buelvas.

    • mario c

      not only do the marlins not need a “near term” solution at 1B, but there is no way they would trade miguel rojas. you should delete your account

    • Zack Dicharry

      Nah no way bro, this is a horrible trade 😂 Marlins are loaded in the OF with prospects and lack infield depth. We surely don’t need an OF or 1B. Why would we give up our captain SS and a solid pen arm when a big need for us is middle infield, along with a depleted pitching staff due to injuries. This trade literally makes 0 sense for the Marlins. It’s basically like “oh hey marlins you have two good players i want, how about you give them to me for no reason and we’ll give you two players you don’t need”

Submit a Comment