Rays & Athletics & Cardinals

Trades

Players

Back

Rays & Athletics & Cardinals

October 14, 2021

Rays

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Baez Minors OF 8.5 6.8 8.5 10.2
Butler Minors OF 1.3 1 1.3 1.6
Walker Minors 3B 29.8 23.8 29.8 35.8

Athletics

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Brujan Minors 2B 40.6 32.5 40.6 48.7
Plummer Minors OF 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.9

Cardinals

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Montas 28 Majors SP Low 2.0 52.6 13.0 39.6 31.7 39.6 47.5
3 Comments
  1. M P

    Sorry, Rays would rather have Montas than the prospects. Straight up Rays/A’s trade makes a ton of sense.

    • Cameron Nordstrom

      I agree, I think a 1 for 1 Brujan for Montas makes total sense. My concern however was that Montas’ projected arbitration salary (~5.2M) potentially being too rich for the Rays. Only Kiermaier and potentially Glasnow would have be paid more next season, and I’ve heard Rays fans try to trade both of them.

      • M P

        Rays aren’t so cheap that they can’t afford $5MM, and no Rays fan would want to trade Glas if he were healthy.

Submit a Comment