This one makes sense for both sides. Given Bundy’s inconsistency, it’s reasonable to expect a package of low-to-middling prospects in return rather than a higher-quality lead piece.
We follow the major prospect evaluation services, and none of them have updated Grisham’s ratings as of yet. If they do so, we will adjust further based on their changes.
This one makes sense for both sides. Given Bundy’s inconsistency, it’s reasonable to expect a package of low-to-middling prospects in return rather than a higher-quality lead piece.
Grisham’s value should probably be adjusted given the season he is having. Probably a top 100 prospect at this point.
It went up a little, based on performance. But as we explain here, we are not prospect evaluators: https://www.baseballtradevalues.com/valuing-minor-leaguers/
We follow the major prospect evaluation services, and none of them have updated Grisham’s ratings as of yet. If they do so, we will adjust further based on their changes.