Submitted by: OliverLyons
| Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
| Cuevas |
27 |
Majors |
OF |
|
Medium |
5.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
-1.8 |
-0.8 |
0.2 |
| Lawrence |
|
Minors |
RHP |
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
| Pint |
|
Minors |
RHP |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
2.4 |
3 |
3.6 |
| Welker |
|
Minors |
3B |
|
|
|
|
|
19.3 |
15.4 |
19.3 |
23.2 |
| Name |
Age |
Level |
P1 |
P2 |
Availablility |
Years |
AFV |
Salary |
Surplus |
Low |
Median |
High |
| Bumgarner |
29 |
Majors |
SP |
|
Medium |
0.5 |
15.1 |
6 |
9.1 |
7.1 |
9.6 |
12.1 |
| Smith |
29 |
Majors |
LHRP |
|
High |
0.5 |
10.3 |
2.1 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
9.2 |
10.2 |
I like it! Welker has some helium, Pint has plenty of upside and Lawrence is a solid third piece. The only question here is if the Rockies are confident enough in their team to push chips in for two rentals.
Rockies would be playing for the wild card and you’re paying a premium to have Bumgarner be your WC game starter.
Competitive windows are only open for so long, and it’s aggressive but I like it.