Mariners & Indians & Padres

Trades

Players

Back

Mariners & Indians & Padres

August 2, 2020

Mariners

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Freeman Minors 2B 24.1 19.3 24.1 28.9
Hankins Minors RHP 5.4 4.3 5.4 6.5

Indians

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Abrams Minors SS OF 58.3 46.6 58.3 70
Gonzales 28 Majors SP Low 5.3 49.4 29.7 19.7 14.8 19.7 24.6
Magill 30 Majors RHRP Medium 3.3 2.0 1.0 1 0.8 1 1.2

Padres

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Clevinger 29 Majors SP Medium 2.3 62.1 17.9 44.2 44.2 50.4 56.6
Raleigh Minors C 7 5.6 7 8.4
1 Comment
  1. John Furlong

    I do not see how this helps Cleveland in 2020 or 2021. Cleveland loses in the switch from Clevinger to Gonzales which hurts in 2020 and 2021 when they control excellent starting pitching. Freeman, though not as highly rated of prospect as Abrams, is still a top 100 prospect on many rankings and is closer to MLB ready with could help the Indians in 2021. In this deal, the Indians would also lose a former first round pick that several prospect ranking sites have outside the top 100 (one at 112, another at 129). Cleveland is also loaded with middle infield prospects at the lower minor league levels. I just do not see this proposal helping the Indians.

    In any trade, Cleveland will be looking for controllable MLB or MLB ready players, especially bats. With player control in 2021 and 2022, I don’t see the reason to force a Mike Clevinger trade, unless it helps the Indians compete in the present and in the future.

Submit a Comment