Yankees & Indians

Trades

Players

Back

Yankees & Indians

August 5, 2020

Yankees

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Civale 25 Majors SP Medium 5.3 36.5 17.2 19.3 15.3 19.3 23.3
Plesac 25 Majors SP Low 5.3 32.2 13.2 19 13.3 17.1 20.9

Indians

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Florial Minors OF 7.6 6.1 7.6 9.1
Frazier 25 Majors OF Medium 3.3 7.6 0.2 7.4 6.2 7.4 8.6
Gil Minors RHP 8.7 7 8.7 10.4
King Minors RHP 4.1 3.3 4.1 4.9
Smith Minors OF 7.6 6.3 7.6 8.9
2 Comments
  1. #1 – Why would Cleveland trade 2/5 of their starting rotation for a headcase DH that they do not need, a prospect losing value as he struggles to get out of high A, and a package of middling prospects.

    #2 – You do not seem to understand how a small market team has to operate. They do not trade 5+ years of two young pitchers that have had success at the major league level. They build around those players. Trading Civale and Plesac makes absolutely no sense for the Indians.

Submit a Comment