Cardinals & Indians & Rangers

Trades

Players

Back

Cardinals & Indians & Rangers

April 7, 2021

Cardinals

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Dunning 26 Majors SP Low 6.0 29.5 13.6 15.9 12.7 15.9 19.1
Gallo 27 Majors OF Medium 2.0 38.4 15.5 22.9 20.6 25.2 29.8
McKenzie 24 Majors SP Low 6.0 44.7 13.9 30.8 24.6 30.8 37
Rodriguez Minors RHP 6.9 5.5 6.9 8.3
Rosario 25 Majors SS Medium 3.0 23.1 14.4 8.7 6.1 7.8 9.6

Indians

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
DeJong 27 Majors SS Low 5.0 66.6 32.5 34.1 20.4 27.2 34.1
Reyes 26 Majors RHRP Medium 3.0 15.6 4.5 11.1 8.9 11.1 13.3

Rangers

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Bader 27 Majors OF Medium 3.0 28.6 12.0 16.6 10 13.3 16.6
Gorman Minors 3B 35.1 28.1 35.1 42.1
5 Comments
    • Henry Decker

      The always rebuilding Indians can never be ignored as trade candidates

      • Jacob Wise

        Okayyy… But what do they do with the pieces they get back? They don’t exactly fit a “rebuild”…

        McKenzie is a long term part of their pitching staff, be it as a SP or if velocity issues continue then the bullpen. And they already have several young SS’s for the foreseeable future that can play anywhere in the infield, so what do they do with De Jong? At least with Rosario they can try him out as CF solution.

  1. John Furlong

    Cleveland has Rosario and the 22 year old Andres Gimenez at SS on the major league club and a farm system filled with strong SS and middle infield prospects. They have no need for DeJong at all. Also, why would the small market Indians trade 6 years of McKenzie and get 3 years of an often injured pitcher in return. This one makes absolutely no sense for the Indians. Notyou is exactly right here.

  2. Big Bat

    Cleveland’s system is loaded with MIF and SP. If another team is not offering a very good 1B or corner OF then there is no reason to deal with them. That’s the bottom line.

Submit a Comment