Braves & Nationals & Reds

Trades

Players

Back

Braves & Nationals & Reds

July 23, 2021

Braves

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Scherzer 36 Majors SP Medium 0.5 25.1 13.7 11.4 11.4 13.7 15.9
Suarez 29 Majors 3B Medium 4.5 42.7 41.2 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.8

Nationals

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Barnhart 30 Majors C Medium 1.5 5.3 2.6 2.7 2.2 2.7 3.2
Hinds Minors OF 6.3 5 6.3 7.6
Miley 34 Majors SP Low 1.5 17.8 12.9 4.9 3.9 4.9 5.9

Reds

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Swanson 27 Majors SS Low 1.5 27.1 12.0 15.1 12.1 15.1 18.1
3 Comments
  1. Ben Huber

    Adding the Reds as a 3rd team so that Braves and their fans can better swallow the intra-division trade concept since they wouldn’t be directly helping the Nats. Hahaha

    • Steven Slater

      This is a garbage deal for the Nats. They’re trading Scherzer for a year of Barnhart, a year of Miley, and a 45 grade prospect. That doesnt really help a team like the Nats, which, by trading Scherzer, are pretty much in a rebuild and looking to come back during Soto’s last couple years in Washington.

  2. Ian Graham

    There’s no reason for any of these teams to trade these players with each other. Braves won’t want Suarez contract. Nationals won’t trade Max in the division and the players the Nationals get don’t really help their future. The best part of the deal is Reds getting Swanson but it doesn’t make sense for the Braves to trade him because then they are without a shortstop.

Submit a Comment