Athletics & Red Sox & Pirates

Trades

Players

Back

Athletics & Red Sox & Pirates

December 7, 2021

Athletics

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Bae Minors SS 7 5.6 7 8.4
Fraizer Minors OF 4.2 3.4 4.2 5
Reynolds 26 Majors OF Low 4.0 120.7 38.7 82 69.6 85 100.5
Winckowski Minors RHP 4.8 3.8 4.8 5.8

Red Sox

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Bassitt 32 Majors SP High 1.0 25.8 8.8 17 13.6 17 20.4
Montas 28 Majors SP Low 2.0 52.6 13.0 39.6 31.7 39.6 47.5
Olson 27 Majors 1B Medium 2.0 71.2 30.0 41.2 37.1 45.3 53.6

Pirates

Name Age Level P1 P2 Availablility Years AFV Salary Surplus Low Median High
Casas Minors 1B 49.8 39.8 49.8 59.8
Mayer Minors SS 47.9 38.3 47.9 57.5
5 Comments
  1. Mike Bradley

    I keep sending Bryan Reynolds to the A’s because you have some great TRADABLE pieces to get to Reynolds’ 85. Boston also has the blue chip prospects that Pittsburgh would say yes to.

    Also, I think Reynolds’ low salary, 4 years of control and ability to be extended would entice the A’s.

  2. Nathan Thompson

    Down vote for Oakland.

    Adding Reynolds to the A’s, at the cost of Montas, Olson, Bassitt, quite literally turns the team into Pittsburgh West. What’s the freaking point?

    • Mike Bradley

      Laureno and Murphy have 4 years of control. Reynolds has 4 years of control and is better. Think it’d be a nice core to build around. 4 years is a long time.

      • jq 7925

        Really don’t think Billy Beane would see an advantage to trading 2 of his top 3 starters and Olson for *one guy* who can’t play those positions. Moneyball means you don’t put all your eggs in one basket, and Reynolds is one big f’ing egg.

      • Nathan Thompson

        Build with what? You’ve invested all the return in Reynolds and it’ll be two years minimum before the A’s are ready to even think of contending… just in time to trade Reynolds, Laureano, and Murphy for substantial value.

Submit a Comment